CHESS STRENGTH :A Comparison Between Correspondence Chess and OTB Chess
Before we begin to evaluate the comparison of various chess rating values, we have to make an important point. Rating is obtained as a result of games played by chess players. The point I am trying to make is that it doesn't say anything explicitly about the strength of the player or the played game. For example if you take a thousand players with a rating of 2000 and make them play amongst themselves some of the players' ratings can reach 2700.
We can make two types of comparisons. We can either compare the ratings or the games of the players at the time they were playing OTB or correspondence chess. We won't do the rating comparison because it is quantitative and unnecessary. The reason behind this is that although the FIDE and ICCF ratings of players may be different this is something that may vary according to the character of the player.While some players are good at fast games the others may close the gap as the thinking time increases. This is something decided in great proportion by the character specialties of a given player. Players with the highest rating in Correspondence chess may only reach 2200-2400 level in OTB chess. However the rating score of Rafael D. Leitao ( a Grand Master in both ICCF and FIDE) is very close to each other.From this we can derive that a player will get a higher rating in the area which he is more inclined to. In fact the correspondence performance of OTB players has always been a matter of curiosity.Oosterom who is a very strong GM acquired a very strong performance for a while.
On the other hand rating doesn't say anything about the game that has been played. It is only interested with the score of the game. For example the national rating and the international rating of a player is usually different.
There is an experiment where a player plays correspondence chess without interfering with the moves of the computer. ( http://chessok.com/?p=24526 ) . Here we see a 2386 rating performance. Considering the technological possibilities that are available today we can surmise that this performance rating can be increased up to the 2400s. From this point on the rating can only increase by the interference of a human with exceptional positional evaluation ability. We are still in an era where human intervention can improve or change the course of the game. One of the best games that demonstrates the power of correspondence chess and human intervention is the Chytilek-Langeveld game. ( http://chessactive.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-mysterious-chytilek-langeveld-game.html ). In this game there are some moves that the computer could not find. And this is in spite of the PC finding Langeveld's moves after a certain depth. For example Chytilek's move 13. Ng5! couldn't be found even at 31st depth.
We can say that the rating level of OTB games has increased by 100 points relative to the time when Karpov-Kasparov World Title match was being played. This rating increase is related to the increase of players with high rating.
theAronian –Anand game in the Tata Steel Chess Tournament. These two parties include moves that can only be found in strong correspondence games. Instead of trying to figure out a rating we can say that the game comprises moves that are above 3000 rating level.
Another thing is that a correspondence player rarely completes the opening stage of a game poorly because he has access to very many databases that are available.When you look at the games at the Tata Steel Chess Tournament “Tata Steel Chess 2013” (http://www.tatasteelchess.com/tournament/livegames) in a 2700 rating average game we can find at least one big mistake with analysis by Houdini x64. But when the rating average increases to 2800 the mistake rate decreases more that the rating difference indicates.
In this chart red bars represent OTB chess and the blue bars represent correspondence chess. As you can see clearly a 3000 rating level game of OTB chess has the same strength with rating of a 2400 level game in correspondence chess. Aronian - Anand game and Topalov - Kramnik game reach around 3000 rating level of OTB chess.
This mysterious game which you may not be able to find in any ordinary database achieved the Beauty Prize of the tournament. We were amazed to find out that it escaped our attention and did not exist in our database. So we checked and double checked, and at the end a friend sent us the game in text format which we carried into PGN. It was a category 16 tournament, a very strong one (In fact the strongest tournament in ICCF history). On the iccf web site there was a special page where we were supposed to find the game with Chytilek's comments. However the web page contained only the first two moves with a note that said that the rest of the story will be supplemented. http://kszgk.com/iccf/?page_id=2679
Another mysterious part of the game is that after the game (and the tournament) we don't see R. Chytilek around anymore. While R. Langeveld went on to win the 26th World CC title, we only see a few OTB games from Chytilek. What's more at the iccf tournament crosstable link (http://www.iccf-webchess.com/EventCrossTable.aspx?id=13481) the 'GET PGN' link is absent. The game was also important because if Lamgeveld had won the game he would also have won the tournament.
After narrating all this maybe someone who knows a little bir more than we do can comment about this game and its players.